Applies To
Marketplaces, Agencies, Platforms
Licensing, Neutrality & Economic Model
I-CIL is neutral infrastructure, not a growth tool for any single platform.
This framework applies to entities that wish to integrate I-CIL scores into their commercial operations:
Participation is licensed, not open. All participants operate under identical governance constraints.
Participation is paid. Influence is not for sale.
The licensing model serves three critical security functions:
The I-CIL model is structurally comparable to:
License fees grant access, not control.
Any platform that issues scores, submits activity, or triggers recalculation must hold an active annual license. This license is contractual, renewable, and governance-bound.
| Participant Type | Illustrative Annual Fee |
|---|---|
| Small agency | ₹2–5 lakh |
| Mid-size marketplace | ₹10–25 lakh |
| Large platform | ₹50 lakh+ |
Revenue scales naturally with adoption. This mirrors per-credit-check pricing used by credit bureaus.
In addition to the license, platforms pay strictly for actual system usage:
Brands pay to read, verify, and audit — never to change outcomes.
This tier applies to brands, auditors, and enterprises that consume data but do not generate influential signals.
No participant can buy a better score.
Revenue flows are completely decoupled from scoring outcomes.
Governance bodies are contractually and financially independent.
Immutable anchoring prevents silent or retroactive changes.
All platforms, regardless of size, operate under identical rules.
Joining is deliberate, not instant. All platforms are reviewed.
Platform eligibility review
License agreement execution
Technical onboarding & API keys
Governance acknowledgment
Production access granted
Platforms participate through licensing.
Scores remain independent, deterministic, and publicly verifiable.